Opinion | Who’s Afraid of Integration? A Lot of People, Actually. (2023)


Continue reading the main story


Supported by

Continue reading the main story

Guest Essay

Opinion | Who’s Afraid of Integration? A Lot of People, Actually. (1)
  • Send any friend a story

    As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.

  • 925

By Thomas B. Edsall

Mr. Edsall contributes a weekly column from Washington, D.C., on politics, demographics and inequality.

(Video) Why Highly Intelligent People Struggle With LIFE

In 1999, Robert D. Potter, a federal judge who was a protégé of Senator Jesse Helms, Republican of North Carolina, ordered the Charlotte-Mecklenburg school district to abandon the busing-for-desegregation program that had integrated its public school system for three decades. Potter declared that the school district had “eliminated, to the extent practicable, the vestiges of past discrimination in the traditional areas of school operations.”

In fact, when Potter’s order was carried out in the summer of 2002, both Black and white students were abruptly transferred from integrated schools to neighborhood schools with much higher levels of segregation. His ruling set in motion what social scientists call a natural experiment — the opportunity to determine who wins and who loses in response to changes in public policy — and what the consequences are.

Three economists, Stephen Billings of the University of Colorado, David Deming of the Kennedy School at Harvard and Jonah Rockoff of Columbia Business School, tapped into a gold mine of data in 2012 to write “School Segregation, Educational Attainment and Crime: Evidence From the End of Busing in Charlotte-Mecklenburg.”

What did they find?

First, they wrote that “the resegregation of schools widened inequality of outcomes between whites and minorities. We estimate that all students, white and Black, score lower on high school exams when they attend schools with more minority students.” Moreover, “a 10-percentage-point increase in the share of minorities in a student’s assigned school decreases high school test scores by about 0.014 standard deviations.”

Billings, Deming and Rockoff wrote that white students were “less likely to graduate from high school or attend a four-year college when they are assigned to schools with more minority students,” but “given the increase in same-race segregation, this implies that white students had higher graduation and attendance rates after the policy change.”

What about crime rates?

“The rezoning of Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools led to statistically significant and large increases in crime among minority males,” they wrote. The increases in crime, according to the authors, “are driven entirely by poor minority males who are assigned to schools with higher shares of poor minority students.”

Billings, the lead author of the paper, has written extensively about the complex, often unintended consequences of policy initiatives governing school suspensions (“Proving the School-to-Prison Pipeline”), failing schools (“Gentrification and Failing Schools: The Unintended Consequences of School Choice Under No Child Left Behind”) and lottery-based school choice (“Does School Choice Increase Crime?”).

I asked Billings to assess the conclusions he has drawn over the decade since the original paper appeared.

He replied by email:

Across all the research I have conducted, there is strong evidence that minority boys are often the “losers” from these educational policies. This same demographic is overrepresented in the criminal justice system, and earlier educational experiences could have stigmatizing effects on later life outcomes. School assignment policies (e.g., school choice lotteries, No Child Left Behind) that allow children to opt out of neighborhood school assignment tend to result in patterns of segregation that likely worsen outcomes for minorities and benefit white families.

Policies that do address poverty and racial inequality, Billings continued, “often involve taking resources away from wealthier and typically white families that has led to some resentment among those groups and fueled popularity” for such politicians as Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis.

In summary, Billings wrote,

(Video) What to do when staff or coworkers undermine you? How to deal with a difficult employee.

the U.S. has improved in many dimensions in dealing with issues of poverty — mostly we have become more acutely aware of systematic issues with respect to race and poverty. We have also seen growth in inequality that has led to a squeezing of the middle class in terms of affordability. In essence, I think we as a society better understand issues of poverty and race, but politically we have become more polarized in how to address these issues. We seem to know more about how society is failing but seem less in agreement about how to fix it.

The issues raised by the abandonment of busing for desegregation in Charlotte-Mecklenburg clearly resonate in the politics of 2023, but there is surprisingly little data to determine where things stand.

I asked Ashley Jardina, a political scientist at George Mason University and the author of “White Identity Politics,” the following question:

If, as the Harvard economist Raj Chetty and others associated with the Moving to Opportunity Project argue, school and housing integration policies improve employment prospects, enhance earnings and increase the likelihood of marriage among minorities, why is there such intransigent opposition among white people?

Jardina replied by email that “work on the racial composition of schools and performance outcomes is really outside of my wheelhouse” but “what is interesting is that on the public opinion side, we also just haven’t even asked white Americans their opinion on issues like busing, school integration and neighborhood diversity on our national public opinion surveys in decades. It’s almost as if the social sciences have assumed that public opinion on these matters has been settled.”

In fact, Jardina continued, “I suspect that school choice and neighborhood composition is where the rubber meets the road for many liberal white Americans who simultaneously consider themselves to be racially progressive and support many policies that would promote racial equality, except for those that might threaten their own house values or local public schools’ test scores.”

In fact, both white and Black views on the deeply divisive issues of achievement gaps, school discipline and promotion requirements are difficult matters to explore.

Two illuminating newspaper articles on the school system in Shaker Heights, Ohio — an affluent suburb of Cleveland that has determinedly sought to be an exception to the nearly universal history of white flight — were reported and written by Laura Meckler in The Washington Post and Debra Kamin in The Times.

In October 2019, Meckler, a graduate of Shaker Heights schools, published “This Trailblazing Suburb Has Tried for 60 Years to Tackle Race. What if Trying Isn’t Enough?

In the 1950s, Meckler wrote, when white people in other communities fled as Black families began to move in, “in Shaker, white families knocked on doors and got to know their new neighbors.”

Shaker Heights, founded as a wealthy and white enclave of privilege, she continued,

reinvented itself. Through it all, the schools built and maintained a reputation of excellence, sending large numbers of students to elite colleges and developing robust Advanced Placement and, later, International Baccalaureate programs. Theater and arts programs are top-notch. Students can take classes in French, Spanish, German, Latin or Greek, plus Mandarin, which is taught to all elementary school students. Last year, the high school sponsored seven international trips for students.

But, Meckler cautioned, racial tensions began to mount nearly three decades ago and have continued to play a central role.

“By the mid-1990s,” she wrote, “integration was well established in Shaker Heights, but so was an unsettling racial achievement gap the district wasn’t talking about. Then came Project Achieve, a biracial committee of parents, teachers and community members formed to dissect the district.”

The committee issued its report in March 1997, noting that

whites made up about half of all students but 93 percent of those in the top 20 percent. Black students made up 82 percent of those who failed at least one portion of a state proficiency exam. Of all grades earned in core high school classes by Black students, about 40 percent were a D or an F.

Once the report became public, “Black students and parents became furious. Some felt they were being painted as academic losers,” Meckler wrote, describing the emergence of anger and resentment that became commonplace in community meetings.

The Times published Kamin’s article “Could Black Flight Change a Model of Integration?” in January. She had found a new dynamic, the migration of Black families away from Shaker Heights:

“Shaker Heights was no longer a first choice for many Black families, and a creeping exodus of Black families to neighboring towns was beginning to take shape,” Kamin wrote. She added:

In Shaker Heights, it’s Black families who are leaving. Many of them point to initiatives rolled out over the past decade meant to combat systemic racism in the classroom — good intentions that they feel have done more harm than good when it comes to their children’s academic achievement.

(Video) STOP Being Exploited - How to Deal with Disagreeable People | Jordan Peterson Motivation

From 2010 to 2021, the Black share of the Shaker Heights population fell to 35.9 percent from 37.1 percent. Kamin noted that

though the dip in Shaker Heights’ Black population has been slight, the shift is noticeable in the public school system. In 2012, Black students made up just over half of students; they now make up about 45 percent of the population. In the same time period, the white student population grew slightly from about 37 percent to nearly 39 percent.

In dozens of interviews, Kamin wrote,

Black and white Shaker Heights residents said the same thing: Shaker Heights appears integrated, but within its schools, where gifted and honors classes have long skewed overwhelmingly white, it is anything but. Data in the school district’s 2020-21 Strategic Plan Annual Report reveals that 31 percent of Black students did not meet competency requirements for 10th grade language arts, compared with 1.95 percent of white students; when it comes to eighth grade algebra competency, 60 percent of Black students didn’t meet the bar compared with 5.45 percent of white students.

Integration, in other words, is an exceptionally fraught process for both Black and white people, even in a liberal (2020 votes: 15,482 for Joe Biden, 1,965 for Trump), affluent (median household annual income: $92,463) suburb with relatively low crime rates (violent crime: 1.73 for every 1,000 residents, compared with 3.36 for all of Ohio).

I asked Ryan Enos, a political scientist at Harvard who has studied the complexities of interracial relations, the same question I posed to Jardina: If school and housing integration policies “improve employment prospects and increase the likelihood of marriage among minorities, why is there such intransigent opposition among white people?”

He replied by email that as the demographics of neighborhoods and communities change,

integration is unstable. This instability plays out again and again in American history, where a neighborhood is dominated by one group and then when another group arrives, the neighborhood is briefly mixed, and then tips toward the other group. This is particularly the case in the United States, where an abundance of cheap land and housing meant that cities could always expand outward, at least for the people that had the means to expand.

Enos pointed to Los Angeles:

You saw this with places like Watts and Crenshaw that became these famously Black parts of the metropolis but were once almost entirely white. However, one thing that many people don’t know is that both of these places are now majority Latino, but the Black population has largely remained, making them mixed areas.

Why didn’t they segregate? Enos wrote:

One answer is that many Blacks living there had neither the ability nor the desire to move, unlike the Anglo whites who fled when Blacks started to move into the areas. So places where we see mixed neighborhoods are often where people are nonwhite and/or places where people are poor. When we focus on wealthy Anglo whites (many of whom are now very liberal), we see segregation over and over again.

He wrote that, on balance, “not only is integration good for minorities, it’s good for everybody because it can lead to more diverse neighborhoods, businesses and institutions, and the science on this is very clear: Diversity makes us smarter and richer.”

Why, then, is residential integration so hard to achieve?

Enos wrote:

A primary but certainly not exclusive reason is that it presents a classic social dilemma where a person’s individual incentives, which may be things like the quality of their children’s school or the price of their home, don’t align with the larger social benefits that take individual actions to achieve — in this case, that action is a willingness to stay in an integrating neighborhood.

Take the case, Enos wrote, “of an individual white homeowner when a community is integrating. Do they want to stay in that community to reap the long-term benefits of diversity when they might be worried about the short-term costs that come with the quality of their school or the price of their home?” He called this choice “the liberal dilemma, where things that liberals value collectively are not things that liberals are individually willing to pay the costs to achieve.”

From 2000 to 2020, there have been modest declines in the segregation levels between white and Black people and between white and Hispanic people.

William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, calculated the national rate of integration, using what is called a segregation index or dissimilarity index, which measures the extent to which two groups (such as white and Black populations) are unequally distributed across neighborhoods in a single metro area. The index ranges from zero (complete integration) to 100 (complete segregation).

The white-Black segregation index fell from 62 in 2000 to 59 in 2010 to 57 in 2020, Frey found. Over the same period, the white-Hispanic segregation index fell from 47 to 46 to 44.

In a separate 2021 study, “Neighborhood Segregation Persists for Black, Latino or Hispanic and Asian Americans,” Frey stressed that “white people still live in mostly white neighborhoods” where “longstanding patterns of segregation persist.” From 2015 to 2019, Frey noted, “the white population share in the neighborhood in which the average white person resides” was 71 percent in large metropolitan areas and was “even larger in smaller metropolitan areas and outside metropolitan areas: 79 percent and 85 percent white.”

Despite all the hurdles described above, there has been substantial progress in addressing racial inequities since the Supreme Court ordered an end to public school segregation in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954.

(Video) Muhammad Ali - Racial Integration

David Deming — an author of the article I mentioned at the beginning of this column — emailed me to say that “the story of American education over the last 30 years has been steady progress.”

More specifically, Deming pointed out that

since 1990, the national high school graduation rate increased from 78 percent to 91 percent. The bachelor’s degree completion rate nearly doubled, from 21 percent to 38 percent. The Black/white gap in high school graduation was 15 percentage points in 1990 but is only 4 percentage points today. Black/white achievement gaps have narrowed slightly, as have gaps by parental education.

In addition, the Black poverty rate fell from 41.8 percent in 1966 to 19.1 percent in 2021. From 1967 to 2021, annual Black per capita income, in inflation-adjusted dollars, grew from $9,971 to $28,648.

The share of law students of color in U.S. schools accredited by the American Bar Association was 11.23 percent in 1987; 20.57 percent in 2000 and 31.01 percent in 2019. In 2019, 13.4 percent of master’s degrees and 9.2 percent of doctoral degrees were awarded to African Americans. In 2021, according to the Census Bureau, 13.6 percent of the U.S. population was Black.

In other words, the overall picture is not bleak; there has been good news and bad news, and the good news signals impressive progress.

Despite those gains, Deming wrote that he is

much more worried about the next 30 years. I am worried about budgetary pressures, demographic headwinds and the unacceptably high cost of education, especially higher education. The economy demands increasingly high levels of skill, and people are living longer. There will be growing demands for some kind of education and training, not just in childhood and young adulthood but throughout working life.

In a 2017 essay, “Why Death Haunts Black Lives,” Douglas S. Massey, a sociologist at Princeton, addressed “the consequences of segregation,” arguing that

the spatial concentration of disadvantage, in turn, predicts a plethora of maladies, including high rates of violence, crime, infant mortality and homicide and low levels of life expectancy, public trust, interpersonal connection and political efficacy. In addition, Black neighborhoods are far more likely than other areas to contain toxic environmental hazards. By systematically exposing them to uniquely high levels of disorder, violence and toxicity, racial segregation functions malevolently to get under the skin of African Americans to compromise health and well-being through a series of increasingly well-understood biosocial pathways.

“A growing body of evidence,” Massey concluded,

suggests that Black and white Americans experience very different health and mortality outcomes throughout the life course, outcomes that occur not simply because Blacks have lower levels of education, income and wealth than whites but because they experience radically more disadvantaged neighborhood circumstances, irrespective of the socioeconomic status they achieve. Owing to the persistence of high levels of Black segregation in the United States, neighborhood disadvantage remains the critical nexus through which Black poverty is transmitted and reproduced across lives and between generations.

Assuming Massey is right that segregation is the vehicle “through which Black poverty is transmitted and reproduced,” policymakers of good will face the enormous and perhaps insuperable task of restoring integration to center stage while somehow avoiding the political and logistical errors that characterized busing and affirmative action in the past.

Though there is light at the end of the tunnel, there are still miles to go.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here's our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.


Continue reading the main story

(Video) Jordan Peterson: Advice for Hyper-Intellectual People


How does integration in education affect students? ›

Several studies have found that students who attend racially diverse schools are more likely to express interest in having neighbors of different races and to live in diverse neighborhoods. Integrated classrooms can improve students' satisfaction, intellectual self-confidence, and leadership skills.

Is integration a desegregation? ›

School integration in the United States is the process (also known as desegregation) of ending race-based segregation within American public and private schools. Racial segregation in schools existed throughout most of American history and remains an issue in contemporary education.

How did desegregation impact American society? ›

Desegregation also resulted in significant long-run improvements in blacks' adult health, as measured by self-assessed general health status; the effect of a five-year exposure to school desegregation is equivalent to being seven years younger.

How does integration affect society? ›

Integration is a dynamic, multi-actor process of mutual engagement that facilitates effective participation by all members of a diverse society in economic, political, social and cultural life, and fosters a shared sense of belonging at national and local levels.

Why is integration important? ›

Integration is one of the most strategic investments a business can make today. A connected business is a smart business. Integrating your business systems enables a holistic view of your customer, your data, and your organizational health. It creates a better customer experience and improves your internal workflow.

When did integration end? ›

Board of Education Supreme Court case that outlawed segregation in schools in 1954.

What does integration look like in the classroom? ›

An integrated classroom is a setting where students with disabilities learn alongside peers without disabilities. Extra supports may be implemented to help them adapt to the regular curriculum, and sometimes separate special education programs are in place within the classroom or through pull-out services.

What does integration mean in school? ›

Integration refers to exceptional students being partially taught in a mainstream classroom. Activities are adapted so the student can “fit in” with their mainstream peers while learning skills that may be better practiced in a room with more age-appropriate peers.

What are the disadvantages of integrated approach? ›

Disadvantages of Integration:

Integration may threaten the coherence and consistency of current arrangements that have the support of everyone involved. Relevant specialists may continue to concentrate on the area of their core expertise and further specialist training may not be needed.

What are the positive effects of integration? ›

Benefits of Economic Integration

It results in a reduction of costs and ultimately an increase in overall wealth. Trade costs are reduced, and goods and services are more widely available, which leads to a more efficient economy.

What do you mean integration? ›

Integration is the act of bringing together smaller components or information stored in different subsystems into a single functioning unit.

Why was desegregation so difficult? ›

Desegregation is difficult to achieve because children of different races live in different neighborhoods. But that's not all: When families are able to choose schools without regard to location—for example, in the case of charter schools—the resulting schools are often more segregated than neighborhood schools.

What are the negatives of desegregation? ›

Specifically, he found that exposure to desegregated schools increased White people's political conservatism, decreased their support for policies promoting racial equity, and negatively affected their racial attitudes toward Black people.

How successful was desegregation? ›

In the most basic sense, they did succeed. School segregation dropped substantially as courts and the federal government put pressure on local districts to integrate. But those efforts also sparked bitter, sometimes racist, resistance that shaped political discourse for decades.

What are the consequences of integration? ›

More specifically, economic integration typically leads to a reduction in the cost of trade, improved availability of goods and services and a wider selection of them, and gains in efficiency that lead to greater purchasing power.

What is the impact of lack of integration? ›

And as the lack of integration does not allow for collaboration or the quick sharing of information, the team ends up not innovating as it should and preventing the company from gaining a better position in the market.

What is a lack of integration? ›

A lack of integration or a poorly implemented integration can mean duplicate data, slow order processing, fulfillment delays, unhappy customers, and profit loss.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of integration? ›

The advantages include increasing market share, reducing competition, and creating economies of scale. Disadvantages include regulatory scrutiny, less flexibility, and the potential to destroy value rather than create it.

Where is integration important in society? ›

Integration has the benefits of allowing citizens to respect other cultures, creating a sense of unity within a community. In addition, individuals that partake in multiple societies gain resources from multiple cultures while expanding their own horizon.

Why is integration important in US history? ›

Integration affirmed the principles of democracy and equality and sought the progressive inclusion of black Americans into the institutions and organizations of American society.

When did the US become fully integrated? ›

On July 26, 1948, Truman responded with Executive Order 9981 directing the military to end segregation. The first article stated, “There shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion or national origin.”

What is integration in US history? ›

Integration is the ending of segregation and allowing whites, African Americans, and all races to be together whether in schools, buses, or movie theaters. Many people in Oklahoma, such as Clara Luper, and nationwide worked to end segregation and bring about integration.

What caused desegregation? ›

The struggle to desegregate the schools received impetus from the Civil Rights Movement, whose goal was to dismantle legal segregation in all public places. The movement's efforts culminated in Congress passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

What do you learn with integration? ›

Integration is the calculation of an integral. Integrals in maths are used to find many useful quantities such as areas, volumes, displacement, etc. When we speak about integrals, it is related to usually definite integrals. The indefinite integrals are used for antiderivatives.

What does a successful integration look like? ›

A successful integration management structure must clearly define responsibilities and reporting relationships. Teams of functional specialists should be tasked with integrating core functional areas. They in turn report to a team with overall responsibility for managing the integration.

What does integration mean in learning? ›

Integrative learning is the process of making connections among concepts and experiences so that information and skills can be applied to novel and complex issues or challenges.

What does integration mean student friendly? ›

To integrate is to make parts of something into a whole. It also means to become one unit, or to make a place (like a school) open to people of all races and ethnic groups.

Why is integration important in the classroom? ›

Integrated teaching and learning processes enable children to acquire and use basic skills in all the content areas and to develop positive attitudes for continued successful learning throughout the elementary grades. Integration acknowledges and builds on the relationships which exist among all things.

What does it mean to integrate kids? ›

Child integration is the inclusion of children in a variety of mature daily activities of families and communities. This contrasts with, for example, age segregation; separating children into age-defined activities and institutions (e.g., some models of organized schooling).

What is one of the main disadvantage of integrating? ›

(1)Reduced breaches of policy due to disclosure of information. (2)Possible denial of service if the keys are corrupted.

What are the characteristics of integrated education? ›

Characteristics of integrated learning:

Allows children to combine ideas and experiences in order to create new learning situations. Include creativity, adaptability, critical reasoning, and collaboration. Accommodates a wide range of learning styles, theories, and multiple intelligences.

Is integration positive or negative? ›

Integration theories distinguish between “positive” and “negative” integration. Positive integration is where common rules are provided by a higher authority to iron out regional and other inequalities. Negative integration refers to barriers between countries being removed.

What are two negative consequences of global integration? ›

Some adverse consequences of globalization include terrorism, job insecurity, currency fluctuation, and price instability.

What is integration in real life? ›

What is the use of Integration in Real Life? Integrals are utilised in a variety of sectors in real life, including engineering, where engineers use integrals to determine the geometry of a building. It's used to describe the centre of gravity, among other things, in physics.

What does integration mean in people? ›

the action or process of successfully joining or mixing with a different group of people: racial/cultural integration.

What is an example of integration? ›

Integration occurs when separate people or things are brought together, like the integration of students from all of the district's elementary schools at the new middle school, or the integration of snowboarding on all ski slopes.

How did people react to the desegregation? ›

Violent opposition and resistance to desegregation was common throughout the country. In August 1967, more than 13 years after the Brown decision, a report by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights observed that “violence against Negroes continues to be a deterrent to school desegregation.”

How does desegregation affect education? ›

Benefits of Desegregation

He found that high school graduation rates for Black students jumped by almost 15 percent when they attended integrated schools for five years. This attendance also decreased those students' chances of living in poverty as an adult by 11 percent.

What were some of the hopes for desegregation? ›

The hope behind desegregation was that it would bring together white and black children to learn with, and from, each other, and end the disparities that blacks suffered under legal segregation -hand-me-down textbooks, decrepit buildings, lower-paid teachers, and, of course, lagging achievement.

What is the benefit of desegregation? ›

Researchers calculated that the more years of school integration Black people experienced in the South, the more likely they were to graduate high school and attend college. Later, they were more likely to be employed and earn higher wages. The more years of integration, the more benefits.

Why should schools be desegregated? ›

Integrated schools help to reduce racial achievement gaps and encourage critical thinking, problem solving, and creativity. Further, attending a diverse school also helps reduce racial bias and counter stereotypes, and makes students more likely to seek out integrated settings later in life.

Is desegregation a civil right? ›

Finally, in 1964, two provisions within the Civil Rights Act effectively gave the federal government the power to enforce school desegregation for the first time: The Justice Department could sue schools that refused to integrate, and the government could withhold funding from segregated schools.

Did desegregation happen quickly? ›

Desegregation did not happen overnight. In fact, it took years for some of the highly resistant states to get on board, and even then some had to be brought on kicking and screaming. Before the Court ever got involved with school integration, desegregation became a matter of executive focus.

Which president was responsible for desegregation? ›

On July 26, 1948, President Harry Truman signed Executive Order 9981, creating the President's Committee on Equality of Treatment and Opportunity in the Armed Services. The order mandated the desegregation of the U.S. military.

Who ordered desegregation? ›

On July 26, 1948, President Harry S. Truman signed this executive order banning segregation in the Armed Forces. In 1940, African-Americans made up almost 10 percent of the total U.S. population (12.6 million people out of a total population of 131 million).

How does integrated teaching improve students learning? ›

Integrated curriculums allow students to have a deeper understanding of the course subject matter and how to apply the material that they have learned in the classroom in a real-world situation[10]. This ultimately helps prepare them for their future studies, career and life in general.

What are the problems or challenges in integrating in teaching and learning? ›

  • 100. 120. 140.
  • Lack of sufficient training. Lack of competence.
  • Lack of confidence. Lack of limited time.
  • Teacher reluctance to new. Lack of knowledge.
  • Inadequate skill. Computer Problems.
  • Software's Problems. Course Material problems.
  • Printer problems. Lack of Motivation.
  • Lack of Finance. Delay in Recruitment of new staff.

What is an example of integration in learning? ›

For example, all students learn math from the same math teacher. In grades four through six, there are two teachers per grade level. One teaches math and science, and the other teaches language arts and social studies. This is departmentalization plus subject integration.

What is the purpose of integrated learning? ›

Integrative learning is the process of making connections among concepts and experiences so that information and skills can be applied to novel and complex issues or challenges.

What are barriers to integration? ›

Answer: lack of resources, inadequate knowledge and skills, institutional barriers, assesment and subject cultures can all serve as significant barriers to implement a well-integrated technology program both in classroom and library media center.

What are the challenges of integration? ›

Understanding these challenges (and their solutions) can help you propel your business and access precious data while it is still valuable.
  • Lack of Planning. ...
  • Using Manual Data Integration. ...
  • Lack of Scalability ability. ...
  • Low-Quality Data. ...
  • Duplicated Data. ...
  • Data in the Wrong Format. ...
  • Data Not Available When Needed.
Apr 4, 2022

What are the challenges to integrate? ›

Top 5 Integration Challenges in 2022 and How to Address Them
  • Data is Collected in Silos. Data silos are a major issues for businesses. ...
  • Each Team is Using Different Systems. ...
  • You Have Several Integration Use Cases. ...
  • You Need to Scale Your Integrations. ...
  • You Need Bi-Directional Integrations.
Feb 10, 2022

What does it mean to integrate people? ›

: to form, coordinate, or blend into a functioning or unified whole : unite. : to incorporate into a larger unit. : to unite with something else. 3. : desegregate.

How integration is done in the classroom? ›

An integrated classroom is a setting where students with disabilities learn alongside peers without disabilities. Extra supports may be implemented to help them adapt to the regular curriculum, and sometimes separate special education programs are in place within the classroom or through pull-out services.

How can integration be practiced in classroom? ›

Collaborate with Teachers

Share IEP's, strengths, needs, accommodations and modifications for the student's success. Most importantly, open up the lines of communication to allow for the sharing of materials and develop a system for the teacher to keep you up to date with what is going on in the classroom.

What is integration in simple words? ›

Integration is the act of bringing together smaller components or information stored in different subsystems into a single functioning unit.

What is a real example of integration? ›

Integrals are utilised in a variety of sectors in real life, including engineering, where engineers use integrals to determine the geometry of a building. It's used to describe the centre of gravity, among other things, in physics. In the field of graphical representation, three-dimensional models are displayed.

What is integration explained simply? ›

Integration is a way of adding slices to find the whole. Integration can be used to find areas, volumes, central points and many useful things. But it is easiest to start with finding the area between a function and the x-axis like this: What is the area?


1. Stunning AI shows how it would kill 90%. w Elon Musk.
(Digital Engine)
2. Can Trump Supporters And Immigrants See Eye To Eye? | Middle Ground
3. Find and Integrate Your Internal Self Rejector
(Teal Swan)
4. Why is it so hard to escape poverty? - Ann-Helén Bay
5. Liam Neeson Threatens a Fan on Jimmy Kimmel Live
(Jimmy Kimmel Live)
6. Premature Integration: Why Toxic/Crazy People Are Known For Having The Best Sex
(Coach Brodie)


Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Greg O'Connell

Last Updated: 18/06/2023

Views: 6680

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (62 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Greg O'Connell

Birthday: 1992-01-10

Address: Suite 517 2436 Jefferey Pass, Shanitaside, UT 27519

Phone: +2614651609714

Job: Education Developer

Hobby: Cooking, Gambling, Pottery, Shooting, Baseball, Singing, Snowboarding

Introduction: My name is Greg O'Connell, I am a delightful, colorful, talented, kind, lively, modern, tender person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.